I offer this claim: "young people are skeptical of the traditional
political ideologies, and even more skeptical of ideological claims and
arguments." Not only do I believe it, I believe it ties together many
of the insights offered here, which I will shamelessly plagiarize
forthwith. Seriously -- if you don't read the posts over there then you're an accomplice.
Obama's not a radical, and therefore pundits seem
confused as to what the young people see in him. But "young people"
aren't hippies or beatniks or yuppies or neocons anymore -- they've
seen (or heard about) those "isms" and have no desire to be the victim
of still more broken promises. Most recently, they've seen huge
deficits, violations of civil liberties, and an unprovoked war passed
off as "conservative" and they ain't buyin' whatever the next snake oil
guy is sellin'. (Or as Dr. S put it, they [and we] are starved for the
truth.)
But Obama's not offering suspect promises -- he's
offering "a voice for the truth." Young people (maybe us too?) want to
get off the fruitless swinging pendulum and do indeed yearn for
normalcy. The pundits have not realized (and some may not be able to)
that this is the new radicalism.
Of course, there's a
hidden ideology in what you think "normal" is. And in this sense
Obama's vision (as articulated by LTG) of a "post-racial, post-conflict
America at peace" is indeed pretty radical, and I think precisely in
line with what "the young people" think of as the ideal "normal".
But
it's not a particularly political ideology -- there isn't some broad
ideal scheme for how we should get from here to there. Instead, there
are plenty of "obvious" incremental steps toward that particular
utopia. Elect a black president. Base diplomacy on something more than
macho posturing. Get the heck out of Iraq. Stop torturing people.
It
is perhaps sad that we have sunk so low that there's a long list of
obvious problems (maybe a presidential term's worth) that can be fixed
before you run out of low-hanging fruit and actually have to consult an
overarching political perspective to guide your next move. But it does
give us the rare opportunity to try the radical experiment of
"rationality" for a while.
Or, alternatively, we could elect McCain.
political ideologies, and even more skeptical of ideological claims and
arguments." Not only do I believe it, I believe it ties together many
of the insights offered here, which I will shamelessly plagiarize
forthwith. Seriously -- if you don't read the posts over there then you're an accomplice.
Obama's not a radical, and therefore pundits seem
confused as to what the young people see in him. But "young people"
aren't hippies or beatniks or yuppies or neocons anymore -- they've
seen (or heard about) those "isms" and have no desire to be the victim
of still more broken promises. Most recently, they've seen huge
deficits, violations of civil liberties, and an unprovoked war passed
off as "conservative" and they ain't buyin' whatever the next snake oil
guy is sellin'. (Or as Dr. S put it, they [and we] are starved for the
truth.)
But Obama's not offering suspect promises -- he's
offering "a voice for the truth." Young people (maybe us too?) want to
get off the fruitless swinging pendulum and do indeed yearn for
normalcy. The pundits have not realized (and some may not be able to)
that this is the new radicalism.
Of course, there's a
hidden ideology in what you think "normal" is. And in this sense
Obama's vision (as articulated by LTG) of a "post-racial, post-conflict
America at peace" is indeed pretty radical, and I think precisely in
line with what "the young people" think of as the ideal "normal".
But
it's not a particularly political ideology -- there isn't some broad
ideal scheme for how we should get from here to there. Instead, there
are plenty of "obvious" incremental steps toward that particular
utopia. Elect a black president. Base diplomacy on something more than
macho posturing. Get the heck out of Iraq. Stop torturing people.
It
is perhaps sad that we have sunk so low that there's a long list of
obvious problems (maybe a presidential term's worth) that can be fixed
before you run out of low-hanging fruit and actually have to consult an
overarching political perspective to guide your next move. But it does
give us the rare opportunity to try the radical experiment of
"rationality" for a while.
Or, alternatively, we could elect McCain.
